Iain Dale's piece about Chris Rennard (Will Rennard survive the leadership change?) is a pile of nonsense in my view. All right, Iain has these little contacts all over the shop and admittedly gears his blog towards "gossip". Yes, I am sure he has heard the odd bit of tittle-tattle and I may be surprised by what happens.
He bases his question, it seems, on James Graham's typically thoughtful piece. But that piece is geared mainly towards a discussion of strategy and Iain's question is a giant leap from that.
I don't think we're going to move Chris Rennard unwillingly from his Chief Executive post in a million years. The discussion about campaigning strategy is a different matter.
The strategy of the party is not the Chief Executive. The Chief Executive is not the strategy. It sounds a remarkable thing to say, because I suppose some of us have been hypnotised into thinking the opposite in recent years - which is a huge tribute to Chris.
The Chief Executive's role is much broader than directing campaigns and he is not solely reponsible for our campaigning strategy.
I am not quite sure what "Rennardism" means. Sure, it's something about targetting. But more importantly, to me, it represents sheer hard work and clever initiative.
I don't think that we will throw the baby out with the bathwater.
What we must do as a party, is stop thinking that our campaigns strategy is Chris Rennard. I am sure Chris would be the first person to enjoy seeing his campaigning ideas being built on by others. Indeed, he said as much in his Liberal Democrat News article:
So what might ‘going beyond Rennard’ mean? A few people might say abandoning what we have learned in our time as Liberal Democrats. But I think that the consensus is based on building on it. If we could make our held seats more secure and more self-sufficient, we can invest in further gains. If we can raise substantially more funds, we can compete in many more areas and many more ways.
It is a mark of Chris Rennard's extraordinary selflessness and belief in our party that he has been the one who has kicked off the discussion with his article "Going beyond Rennard".
Monday, December 10, 2007
We're not going to throw the baby out with the bath water
Written by Paul on Monday, December 10, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)



5 comments:
I wasn't going to post about Rennard until I read James's piece, but two members of the LibDem front bench team confirmed to me that his departure is openly being discussed in some quarters. You can believe I have made that up if you want to and hide your head in the sand. As i made clear, I think you'd be mad.
Iain dearest, the clue was in the sentence:
Yes, I am sure he has heard the odd bit of tittle-tattle
So I was actually emphasising thereby that I didn't think you are making it up - I am just querying the significance of what you have been told.
It is a pile of nonsense - ie doesn't amount to anything in my view.
I hardly think scepticism towards Iain Dale equates to sticking one's head in the ground. There is more going on above the ground than the Iain Dale blog.
Open discussion is the preserve of open minds.
LibDems remain unwilling to prejudice their conclusions with preconcieved notions and emotional attatchments - it is the only way anyone will reach good decisions, as what is best requires careful consideration of what is worst.
And that means specifically in relation to the topic under discussion.....?
Post a Comment